To begin, a few comments on
language:
Talking about the ego is tricky,
for our language assumes very specific answers for many of the questions we
might want to discuss. For example, if I say “I think,” what is it that is
taking an action, and what is the action? What does “I” point to? In just about
all uses, it points directly at some ego or another. This can get us into
trouble very quickly.
We might translate “I think
that...” to something like “Ego is providing the information that....” This
raises two questions:
1) To what is ego providing the
information?
2) Are there sources of
information besides ego available to us?
Approaching the first question
cuts right to the heart of spiritual practice. If we are not our egos, what are
we? There are many names for it, but they are only placeholders. To really
know, we must seek out direct experience of it. For the sake of discussion,
I’ll use “that which experiences” as my placeholder of choice
In my experience (Whose
experience?!) “The record of observations of that which observes around these
parts” ... to be clear is so tricky!), the answer to the second question is an
emphatic “YES!” As we learn to turn our attention away from ego, we find that
there is a tremendous wealth of information - joyful, life-affirming,
effortless, and true - available to us in any given moment. What are we to call
the source of all this wonderful information? Profoundly creative being that I
am, I’ll refer to this as “the source of true information.”
I hasten to emphasize again that
these are merely placeholders that point to experiences one must seek out to
begin to answer these questions. I (!) hope that using a phrase instead of a
word will help us to avoid the confusion between the pointer and that which is
pointed to - the finger and the moon, if you will.
With our linguistic disclaimers
out of the way, let’s turn to the question:
“In what way is the ego an
illusion?”
My understanding is that the ego
is something like a mirage; something is clearly there, but our vision of it is
indistinct, and we can’t quite make out what is. This leads us to be misled
about its nature and what it means for us.
The only mirage I’m personally
familiar with is the one that appears on hot days on the highway. In the
distance it appears as if the road is swallowed up by a great blue lake, and
yet when you arrive at any given point you find only dry highway. Something is
clearly going on, but we lack the knowledge to make sense of it. Thus, it seems
like a vast lake is retreating away from us as we head down the road.
If we had a friend along for the
ride who knew some physics, she might explain to us that the black asphalt of
the road was heating the air above it, and that the hot air has a different
refractive index than the air around it, causing light from a patch of sky to
be bent up toward our eyes. With our friend’s help we can see that what we took
for a vast pool of water is in fact a trick of light and a bit of hot air.
With ego, we are similarly
confused on two counts: we’re mixed up about what it is, and have trouble
getting a sense of the scale of it. We need someone like our learned physics
friend above to help us see through the illusion. This is why we encounter bits
of scriptures like the following:
“If you see someone wise, who can
steer you away from the wrong path, follow that person as you would one who can
reveal hidden treasures. Only good can come of it.” --Dhammapada 76
“Good friends! You already
possess the prajna wisdom of enlightenment! But because your minds are deluded,
you can’t understand by yourselves. You need to find a truly good friend to
show you the way to see your nature. Good friends, the buddha nature isn’t
different for the ignorant and the wise. It’s just that people are deluded or
awake. When people are deluded, they’re ignorant. When they wake up, they
become wise.” -- The Platform Sutra of Hui-Neng
Fortunately, there are lots of
good friends available to help us understand - most especially our cushions!
So what is ego? It is the kernel
of conditioned mind, that which every suffering being has in common. It is the
central core of the myriad attention monopolizing machines which keep suffering
beings from discovering that they already have all they need to live in peace
and joy. The primary way it accomplishes this feat is to continuously provide
the information that ego and “that which observes” are one and the same. This
is how ego becomes the “self” that is separate from everything else.
In order to maintain the illusion
that it is all there is to know about a given suffering being, ego makes itself
out to be vast and overwhelming. When we are in it, this seems very true.
Everywhere we look we’re met with ego’s information about what is true of us and
the world, but this too is an illusion. Ego is like the sheen on an oil drop
floating on the ocean. If you’re inside the drop looking out, the sheen is everywhere.
In every direction you turn, you’re dazzled by brilliant greens, reds and
yellows. If, however, you move in any direction you find yourself swimming in
the vast blue ocean. From this place, the drop is seen for what it is - a tiny
point in an unending sea.
This leads us to a very different
model of experience than the one that prevails in most places and times. “That
which observes” exists in a vast space of possibility. It can turn its
attention wherever it pleases. Overwhelmingly this space is occupied by “the
source of true information.” One very small region of this vast space is
inhabited by ego. When “that which observes” moves its attention into ego’s
domain, it is bombarded by the information that this is the only thing that
exists. If it believes the information, then it falls into the illusion of ego
and remains trapped in that small space with ego.
In our lives, asking for help is
one way of making the move out of the drop. Going to the cushion is another
way. As soon as we make an effort to take care, the illusion begins to unravel
and we can see that we exist in a much larger space than the tiny corner ego
wants to keep us in.
Gassho
Bee
You wrote:
ReplyDeleteWe might translate “I think that...” to something like “Ego is providing the information that....” This raises two questions:
Its not my experience that thinking is always ego providing information. Sometimes what I call thinking is actually "whatever is beyond ego" providing information. If that weren't possible, then it seems to me that all the true information would be completely mute, and every discursive movement would be ego. And I do not find that to be the case. So, for me, its important to distinguish between different kinds of thinking. I've been observing myself trying to get clearer on this distinction.
A provocative post and comment on this concept of ego as our thinking selves. I especially was drawn to Cheri's comment.“That which observes” exists in a vast space of possibility. It can turn its attention wherever it pleases. Overwhelmingly this space is occupied by “the source of true information.” Perhaps "true information" is learning to discern between what ego tells us, and what comes from "our true wisdom" - Yeow - words, explanations always fail. Thank you both for your wonderful insights as I observe my "self" trying to get clearer.
ReplyDeleteWhat Stephen said seems true. Some thoughts feel malignantly driven by ego: "You can't be a whole person unless your life is impressive to X", while other thoughts are like whispers from a divine friend, "Just do your best right now." The words in the post about the experience of believing ego like being inside a drop of oil in the ocean, surrounded by dazzling color, is really rocking my mind right now. When I am immersed in the pain of ego, I see a perfect, sensual, pleasurable world that is just beyond my grasp, that I could have if only I was good enough. I want to teach myself the profoundly delusional nature of this thinking. Thanks for this series of posts!
ReplyDelete